Blackjack bomber vs b1
Nov 10, · Air War: America's B-1 Bomber vs. Russia's Tu (Who Wins?) The Tuwhile it looks similar to the B-1B--is a very different aircraft. The Soviet Union designed the Blackjack primarily as a means to deliver a nuclear strike during World War Three. However, the Soviets designed the jet mainly as. Nov 14, · Myth dispelled: Tu Blackjack = copy of B1 between the Russian Tu Blackjack and the American B-1 strategic bomber development from the. Nov 19, · Which bomber do you think is better- the B-1B Lancer or the Tu "Blackjack"?
Russia's Deadly Tu-160 Bomber vs America's B-1: Who Wins?
No, I don't think there's any evidence to support that either. In place of the nuclear capability, the bomber was given a new conventional role starting with Conventional Mission Upgrade Program. Russian strategic nuclear forces. Originally posted by iqonx also lets be real how do we know for sure america didnt copy russias designs for the b1-lancer. Yeah, but what's the debate on it? Given that winning a motor race is about being that little bit better than the opposition, such stories are not surprising, although - as most engineers will admit - the danger in 'copying' is that the compromises, which the original designers made, are unknown to those that reproduce it. There are only 15 complete Tus although the sixteenth is in the process of being completed.
Air War: America's B-1 Bomber vs. Russia's Tu-160 (Who Wins?)
Chat or rant, adult content, spam, insulting other members, show more. Harm to minors, violence or threats, harassment or privacy invasion, impersonation or misrepresentation, fraud or phishing, show more. Why does the Russian Tupolev Tu bomber look like the U. Pictures of Tu http: Pictures of B-1 http: Are you sure you want to delete this answer?
I do believe Russian scientists and engineers followed the path of least resistance in that regard including our F, F and Space Shuttle programs just to name a few. Reverse engineering at its best, both sides being guilty of it. As history would have it On September 6, Victor Belenko became a known world wide incident. This fighter had enough fuel to be flown to Hakodate Japan where western scientist reversed engineered that aircraft to pieces against the Soviets commands to release it.
One being the first plane to surpass , ft and a straight up "zoom" climb to , ft till its engines flamed out. This particular defection was most damaging to the Soviet Air Force and because of this incident the Soviets limited the amount of fuel they gave to its pilots.
The MIG was the reason that scared the western world into developing the F Eagle air superiority program. Victor Belenko was given political asylum here in the U. I suppose the Soviets have a grudge still?
Good correspondence of scores (especially in the higher score ranges) between this version and version 2. Ира ускорилась, теперь это был торопливый минет с пикантной толикой смертельного ужаса, быть увиденной учениками.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. Which is the better bomber? You may not vote on this poll. Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 Last Jump to page: Results 1 to 15 of Originally Posted by Silent Hunter. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote! Well there is a modernization program in place for the black jacks, along with restarting the production lines. We'll see where that gets them. But yes they are different purpose-aircraft, so a direct comparison makes little sense.
Originally Posted by omon. Tu is a seriously impressive piece of engineering but is ultimately beaten not only by the B-1's better maintenance but also its superior numbers; there are IIRC 66 B-1Bs versus 20 Tus.
If it's the designs then maintenance and numbers are irrelevant, we're only talking engineering. If it's the bomber fleets then USA wins hands down. As I always say, it never makes sense to look at a weapon in isolation; it is always part of a system. B-1B has better defensive systems and a smaller radar cross section making it the better penetration bomber.
Originally Posted by Levsha. I have always had the opinion that if the Russians were to ever get financially capable like in the Soviet days, they would certainly be a force to be reckoned with.
They lost their money but never their technolgy. Originally Posted by wabpilot. There are only 15 complete Tus although the sixteenth is in the process of being completed.
It is just as important to manage your money properly at the blackjack table as it is to make the correct play on every hand. You need to know when to increase your bets and when to reduce them. You need to understand which bets are sound and which ones are not. Understanding how to manage your money at the blackjack table can greatly improve your chances of walking away with a nice profit.
What Is A Bankroll? Simply put, your blackjack bankroll is the money you have set aside for playing blackjack. Your bankroll is one of your two most potent weapons against the casino. The other one is your knowledge of the game and the ability to apply proper strategy.
These two weapons—your bankroll and your knowledge—are dependent upon one another. One cannot exist without the other. If you have no knowledge, a fat bankroll is just more money that you will ultimately lose. Your bankroll is a separate amount of money that is dedicated solely to your gambling activities. It should not include the rent and bill money. Wait until you build the necessary funds. There is an old proverb in gambling which says scared money never wins. The proverb is true. When you gamble with money that you cannot afford to lose, lose you will.
The reason is because you will lack the confidence to apply proper betting strategy and maximize your potential winnings. The size of your bankroll will determine the table limits at which you are able to successfully play.
Here is a general rule: Why 50 times the minimum? The reason is because a bankroll of that size will enable you to endure the swings that inevitably come in a game of blackjack.